episode one

race and slavery in colonial america

Have you ever wondered why, in the United States, slavery was based on race? Have you ever thought about why conversion to Christianity did not change the status of slaves? Using colonial Virginia as an example, this episode explores how race became interwined with slavery and how Christians used the faith both to challenge race-based slavery and to underwrite the identification between race and slavery.

Key Questions:

  1. How did it happen that, in colonial Virginia, some people came to be seen as most appropriately property, as “slaves by birth”?
  2. Why, in America, was slavery deemed appropriate only for those who had some African ancestry?
  3. What was the role of Christianity in the identification of slavery with race?

Reflection Questions:

  1. What in this episode most surprised or challenged you?
  2. For some Americans, it is important that the early colonial project be a good one, undertaken for noble, even holy reasons. According to this episode, those reasons had much to do with money. How did you react to Sarah’s claims about the economic motivations behind colonization? Why do you think you reacted that way?
  3. The Anglican Church in colonial Virginia had to grapple with the reality that many other religious groups would as well: slave owners would be unwilling to allow them access to slaves if the church did not support slavery (and slave owners would probably not be church participants either). That was not the only reason that various denomination countenanced or supported slavery, but it was part of the calculus. And it raises a question: at what point (if any) does complicity with an institution like race-based slavery, even purportedly for the sake of evangelization, undermine the claims of the gospel? When is it better to risk losing converts than to make peace with social and economic institutions? How do we know?
  4. The slaves who wrote the Bishop of London made their case based on brotherhood (and sisterhood) in Christ. They asked that shared Christian faith matter more than race. Do you have identities that, either in theory or in practice, matter more to you than your Christian one? Do you have identities that make it hard to see some Christian brothers and sisters as your spiritual siblings?

References and Sources

Photo Credits:

Primary sources:

1705 An Act Concerning Servants and Slaves, http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/amerbegin/power/text8/BeverlyServSlaves.pdf

“Letter from Virginia Slaves to Bishop Edmund Gibson (1723), Encyclopedia Virginia, https://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/_Letter_from_Virginia_Slaves_to_Bishop_Edmund_Gibson_August_4_September_8_1723

Secondary Sources:

Bond, Edward L. “Colonial Virginia Mission Attitudes toward Native American Peoples and African-American Slaves.” In Remembering Jamestown, 69–90. Eugene, Or: Wipf and Stock, 2010.

Brown, Kathleen M. Good Wives, Nasty Wenches, and Anxious Patriarchs: Gender, Race, and Power in Colonial Virginia. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1996.

Davis, David Brion. Inhuman Bondage: The Rise and Fall of Slavery in the New World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Glasson, Travis. Mastering Christianity: Missionary Anglicanism and Slavery in the Atlantic World. 1 edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Goetz, Rebecca Anne. The Baptism of Early Virginia: How Christianity Created Race. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012.

“Slavery and the Law in Virginia,” Colonial Williamsburg, https://www.history.org/history/teaching/slavelaw.cfm